Proculigyrus cicatricosus ( Prell, 1937 ) López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5211.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5754769C-B747-4714-BDD9-7D5509D48BEB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7399788 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A209493B-FD4B-FF94-AFA6-1F28FB4BBA30 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Proculigyrus cicatricosus ( Prell, 1937 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Proculigyrus cicatricosus ( Prell, 1937) View in CoL new combination
( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 2F View FIGURE 2 , 4B View FIGURE 4 , 5B View FIGURE 5 , 8A, D View FIGURE 8 , 9B View FIGURE 9 , 11B View FIGURE 11 , 12B, 12H View FIGURE 12 , 13B View FIGURE 13 , 14B View FIGURE 14 , 15C View FIGURE 15 , 17C View FIGURE 17 , 21B View FIGURE 21 , 24C View FIGURE 24 ; 40 View FIGURE 40 )
Ligyrus cicatricosus Prell, 1937: 90 . Original combination.
Male lectotype designated by Endrödi (1969) (ZMHB) “ Mexico // Ligyrus / ( Anagrylius ) / cicatricosus Prell / ♂ -Type // Lectotypus / Ligyrus / cicatricosus / Prell / Endrody”. Female paralectotype (ZMHB) “ Mexiko / Coll / Dr. ITZINGER // Ligyrus / cicatricosus Prell / ♀ -Type // Paratypus / Ligyrus / cicatricosus / Prell”. Type locality: Mexico.
Description. Habitus as in Fig. 24C View FIGURE 24 . Length 16.5–25.2 mm. Humeral width 8.2–13.3 mm. Color black, legs lighter. Head: Frons slightly concave between eyes and behind frontoclypeal tubercles; surface with deep, large, confluent punctures, nearly smooth on vertex and only with sparser punctures. Clypeus trapezoidal ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ). Apical clypeal teeth transverse, small, separated by 5 tooth diameters. Ocular canthus acute. Frons with 2 tumescences. Interocular distance 3.7 times the transverse ocular diameter. Antennal club short. Pronotum: Surface with punctures evenly sparse, deep, large, weakly umbilicate. Apex without defined tubercle, with an inconspicuous swelling and small fovea. Elytra: Inner surface of apex with transverse tubercles forming about 85 parallel lines ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ). Abdomen: Tergite IV with 6 transverse, inconspicuous striae ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Sternite VIII of female with narrow emargination. Pygidial surface completely punctate ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ); punctures subequal in size to those of elytral apex, ocellate, minutely setigerous. Surface evenly convex in male, slightly convex in female. Venter: Apex of prosternal process spherical, with dense setae. Metespisternum without setae. Metasternum with small, deep, confluent punctures; with long setae, denser on anterior corners. Legs: Male protarsus simple; inner claw simple. Protibia tridentate, basal tooth distant from the others ( Fig. 11B View FIGURE 11 ). Apical margin of mesotibia and metatibia dentate ( Fig. 12B, H View FIGURE 12 ). Apex of metatibia with 4–7 spinules. Female genitalia: Subcoxite 1.8 times wider than long, outer sides narrowed towards apex (basal margin 1.5 times wider than apical margin). Coxite subrounded (as long as wide); surface strongly concave. Subcoxite as wide as coxite; shorter than coxite ( Fig. 13B View FIGURE 13 ). Male genitalia: Spiculum gastrale T-shaped, thickened ( Fig. 14B View FIGURE 14 ). Parameres with a ventral, truncate tooth on each side; without dorsal teeth ( Figs. 15C View FIGURE 15 , 17C View FIGURE 17 ). Internal sac with 12 accessory lamellae like spines and with a flat, oval base ( Fig. 21B View FIGURE 21 ).
Diagnosis. It is the only known species in the genus and can be differentiated from other Pentodontini by the combination of the following characters: clypeus trapezoidal, clypeal teeth small, frontoclypeus with tumescences ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ); apex of mesotibia and metatibia dentate ( Fig. 12B, H View FIGURE 12 ); mentum subquadrate ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ); protarsus of male simple; pronotum and pygidium with deep, large punctures; and parameres with wide, acute medial teeth and an apical long projection directed outwards on each side ( Figs. 15C View FIGURE 15 , 17C View FIGURE 17 ).
Distribution. Mexico, Guatemala ( Ratcliffe et al. 2013), El Salvador, Honduras ( Ratcliffe & Cave 2006), Costa Rica ( Ratcliffe 2003), and Colombia ( López-García et al. 2015).
Locality records ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ). 33 examined specimens from FSCA, ICN, IEXA, UNSM, USNM, ZMHB. Some records from Ratcliffe (2003), Ratcliffe & Cave (2006), and Ratcliffe et al. (2013). COLOMBIA (1). Valle del Cauca (1): Buenaventura, Río San Juan. COSTA RICA (1). Puntarenas (1): Rancho Quemado. EL SALVADOR (23). Ahuachapan (3): Caserío San Miguelito; Parque Nacional El Imposible. La Libertad (16): San Andrés; Santa Tecla. Santa Ana (3): Hacienda Montecristo, Cerro Miramundo, Metapán. San Salvador (1): San Salvador. GUATEMALA (31). Alta Verapaz (1): Finca Chulac, Mayanaquel Mining Company. Baja Verapaz (7): Biotopo de Quetzal; Carretera a Chilasco; Purulha. Chiquimula (1): Las Presas, arriba de Concepción Las Minas. El Progreso (2): El Rancho; Finca El Riscosa (5 km N El Pacayal). Escuintla (3): Peñón de Siquinalá; Santa Lucía Cotzumalguapa. Huehuetenango (1): Barillas, Malpaís. Izabal (5): Cerro Negro Norte (1 km W Honduras); Morales, Finca Firmeza. Suchitepequez (1): Finca El Vesubio (12 km N Patulul). Zacapa (10): Finca Santa Cruz, Marble Quarry road (NE Teculután); La Union (5-6 km S); road to San Lorenzo Marmol Mine (NW Tuculután); Teculután. HONDURAS (28). Atlántida (2): La Ceiba. Comayagua (3): El Taladro; Siguatepeque. Cortés (6): Cofradia (9.3 km NW); Lago de Yojoa; Parque Nacional Cusuco. El Paraíso (11): Capire (8.3 km SE); El Paraíso. Francisco Morazán (1): Cerro Uyuca. Olancho (2): Montaña del Malacate. Yoro (3): Parque Nacional Pico Pijol. MEXICO (11). Chiapas (5): Cañón El Chorreadero (5 mi. E Chiapa de Corzo); El Aguacero (16 km W Ocozocautla); Suchiapa (5 km SE). Oaxaca (2): Cuicatlán (15 mi. N); Salina Cruz (5 km N). Tabasco (1): Villa Hermosa. Veracruz (3): Puente Nacional; Veracruz.
Natural history. Specimens have been found mainly in cloud forests up to 2,300 m but also in tropical humid forests near sea level. Most individuals have been collected with light traps between April and May.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Dynastinae |
Genus |
Proculigyrus cicatricosus ( Prell, 1937 )
López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc 2022 |
Ligyrus cicatricosus
Prell, H. 1937: 90 |