Tomarus adoceteus Ratcliffe & Cave, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5211.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5754769C-B747-4714-BDD9-7D5509D48BEB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7383769 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A209493B-FD69-FFB7-AFA6-19C1FEE3BA9F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tomarus adoceteus Ratcliffe & Cave, 2010 |
status |
|
Tomarus adoceteus Ratcliffe & Cave, 2010
( Figs. 1H View FIGURE 1 , 16A View FIGURE 16 , 19A View FIGURE 19 , 27A View FIGURE 27 ; 41 View FIGURE 41 )
Tomarus adoceteus Ratcliffe & Cave, 2010: 7 View Cited Treatment . Original combination.
Male holotype (BMNH) “Roy Soc-CIG Expdn. / Little Cayman, BWI / Pirates’ Point / House light / 30.7.1975. R.R.Askew // BM 1981 / 342 // TOMARUS / ADOCETEUS / RATCLIFFE & CAVE / HOLOTYPE ” Female paratype (BMNH) “GRAND CAYMAN IS. B.W.I. / Georgetown / 16 sept 1973 / E. J. Gerberg // At black light // Ratcliffe & Cave / db Dynastine / West Indies // TOMARUS / ADOCETEUS / RATCLIFFE & CAVE / PARATYPE. Female paratype (BMNH) “WEST INDIES: Cayman Is. / Grand Cayman / VI-1992 coll. P. Fitzgerald / blacklight trap // Ratcliffe & Cave / db Dynastine / West Indies // TOMARUS / ADOCETEUS / RATCLIFFE & CAVE / PARATYPE. Female paratype (BCRC) “Roy Soc-CIG Expdn. / Little Cayman / Pirates’ Point / 9.viii.1975 // TOMARUS / ADOCETEUS / RATCLIFFE & CAVE / PARATYPE ”. Type locality: Pirates’ Point, Little Cayman Island .
Description. Habitus as in Fig. 27A View FIGURE 27 . Length 20.0– 22.5 mm; humeral width 10.3–12.4 mm. Color dark reddish brown to black. Head: Frons and clypeus coarsely and densely rugose. Frontoclypeal region with 2 transverse, low tubercles separated by about 7 tubercle diameters. Clypeus narrowed towards apex, base 3 times as wide as apex ( Fig. 1H View FIGURE 1 ). Clypeal teeth small, transverse, separated by a tooth diameter. Mandible with 2 apical teeth and a lateral, slightly rounded tooth. Mentum abruptly constricted at apical 3rd. Galea of maxilla with teeth 5 and 6 vestigial. Interocular distance 3.5 times an eye width. Pronotum: Surface with small punctures; denser and deeper on anterior and lateral angles. Apical tubercle small, rounded, not visible in lateral view. Subapical fovea shallow, elongate, narrow (1/3 the interocular distance); equal in both sexes, surface rugopunctate. Scutellum: With deep, large punctures forming 2 lines parallel to margins. Elytra: Punctures on first interval as large as those on other intervals; sutural stria complete. Inner surface of apex with rounded, large tubercles forming 13–14 parallel lines. Abdomen: Apex of tergite IV with a triangular wide area with small, irregular tubercles forming 12–14 diagonal, nearly parallel lines. Pygidium with dense rugosity on basal 3rd; apex rounded. Venter: Apex of prosternal process flat, transversely oval to rounded. Metasternum with minute setae on anterior angles. Legs: Protibia tridentate, without basal denticle. Apex of metatibia crenulate, with 10–11 spinules. Male genitalia: Phallobase 1.2 times longer than parameres. Parameres with 2 dorsal teeth on each side; basal tooth acute, longer than apical tooth that is inconspicuous ( Figs. 16A View FIGURE 16 , 19A View FIGURE 19 ). Internal sac with copulatory lamella and short lamellar spiny belt; with a complex of 7 spine-like, accessory lamellae, with dense granules at base.
Diagnosis. Tomarus adoceteus is differentiated by the following character combination: frontoclypeal tubercles transverse and low ( Fig. 1H View FIGURE 1 ); galea of maxilla with teeth 5 and 6 vestigial (as in T. subtropicus , Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ); pronotal surface with small punctures; pronotal tubercle not visible in lateral view; pronotal fovea shallow and narrow (1/3 as wide as interocular distance) ( Fig. 27A View FIGURE 27 ); protibia tridentate, without an additional basal denticle; apex of metatibia with 10–11 spinules; parameres with 2 dorsal teeth on each side, main teeth long, widely separate from secondary; apex of parameres slender ( Figs. 16A View FIGURE 16 , 19A View FIGURE 19 ).
Taxonomic remarks. Tomarus adoceteus was described originally by Ratcliffe & Cave (2010) in the genus Tomarus , but Morón & Grossi (2015) placed it in Ligyrus , while their most similar species were remained in Tomarus . The phylogenetic analysis evidences that this species does not have a close relationship with the members of Ligyrus , so it is maintained in its original combination.
Distribution. Bahamas and Cayman Islands ( Ratcliffe & Cave 2015). A single male specimen from Yucatán ( Mexico) was examined but more evidence is necessary to confirm that the species occurs in that country.
Locality records ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ). 7 specimens examined from BCRC, BMNH, and IEXA. Some records from Ratcliffe & Cave (2015). BAHAMAS (6). Bimini (4): Allen Cay; North Bimini; South Bimini. CAYMAN ISLANDS (7). Grand Cayman (3): Georgetown. Little Cayman (4): Pirate’s Point. MEXICO (1). Yucatán (1): Reserva Estatal El Palmar .
Natural history. Little is known about T. adoceteus . Specimens have been found between June and September using blacklights.
BCRC |
Bioresource Collection and Research Center |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Dynastinae |
Genus |
Tomarus adoceteus Ratcliffe & Cave, 2010
López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc 2022 |