Pteroptyx
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3653.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:72A07BC6-AEB0-4EBC-AFA8-F5871065680F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E46FF216-5E66-C52A-FF6F-B81DFDCFEF57 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pteroptyx |
status |
s. str. |
Pteroptyx View in CoL s. str. Olivier
Pteroptyx Olivier, 1902:72 View in CoL ; 1907:55; 1909a:319; 1909b:lxxxii; 1910b:47; 1911b:16; 1913a:58. Olivier & Pic, 1909:139. McDermott, 1959:10 (partim); 1964:46 (partim); 1966:117 (partim). Ballantyne & McLean, 1970:223 (partim). Ballantyne, 1987a:117; 1987b:171; 2001:51. Ballantyne et al. 2011:8 View Cited Treatment (partim).
Nec Ballantyne in Calder 1998:180.
Type species. Olivier (1902) described Pteroptyx View in CoL from 2 species viz. Luciola testacea Motsch. and Luciola malaccae Gorham. Lucas (1920) designated Luciola testacea as the type species of Pteroptyx View in CoL (see Ballantyne in Calder 1998:179). Ballantyne and McLean (1970) were of the opinion, from an examination of a black and white photograph of the type species, that Luciola testacea lacked deflexed elytral apices and its taxonomic position is uncertain, and considered that Luciola malaccae should be advanced to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature for consideration as the type species of Pteroptyx View in CoL s. str. This matter has been held in abeyance until a phylogenetic analysis established the position of all species with deflexed elytral apices.
Diagnosis. Pteroptyx s. str. is an oriental genus that belongs in a group of 7 genera with males characterized by: an elongate slender aedeagus with apices of LL concealed behind the median lobe when viewed from beneath, pronotal width less than width across elytral humeri, parallel-sided elytra, aedeagal sheath elongate slender, widest across middle, with posterior half of sternite not emarginate on either side, and tapering evenly towards a narrow entire apex. Males of Pteroptyx s. str. have a MFC, deflexed elytral apices, aedeagal sheath with bulbous paraprocts and bipartite LOs in V7. Males are distinguished from Australoluciola which has entire LOs in V7 and lacks the MFC; from Colophotia in lacking a median carina on V7, expanded and oblique PLP and elongate slender aedeagal sheath; from Pyrophanes and Poluninius gen. nov. which lack deflexed elytral apices; from Trisinuata gen. nov. and Medeopteryx gen. n which lack the MFC and bulbous aedeagal sheath paraprocts. It differs from Luciola indica in lacking the bulbous median lobe and non deflexed elytral apices. Two presently undescribed species were identified in this analysis ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–5 Node 15 blue numbers 5, 6) (one without deflexed elytral apices; Ballantyne in prep.).
List of species of Pteroptyx s. str.
Key to species of Pteroptyx View in CoL from SE Asia using males
Modified slightly from, and with figure references to, Ballantyne et al. (2011). Interpretation of colour patterns in the elytra in ethanol preserved specimens where the underlying dark hind wing becomes visible may be difficult. Ballantyne (2008) suggested pulling the elytron aside and allowing it to dry.
1. V7 with slender incurving hair bearing lobes along its posterior margin between PLP and MPP (arrowed in Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 9, 10 View FIGURES 9–17 ); LOs in V7 restricted to very small anterolateral plaques; PLP of V7 narrowed and considerably produced beyond the posterior margin of the MPP; T8 prolonged apically beyond MPP with margins converging posteriorly ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 9, 10 View FIGURES 9–17 ).................................................................. macdermotti McLean V View in CoL 7 without slender incurving hair bearing lobes along its posterior margin between PLP and MPP; LOs in V7 never restricted to very small anterolateral plaques; if posterolateral processes of V7 narrowed then not produced far beyond the posterior margin of MPP if at all; T8 not as above...................................................................... 2
2. T8 bearing slender elongate lobes along its posterior margin to either side of the posterior median emargination ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 , 13 View FIGURES 9–17 ); flanges on ventral surface of T8 absent; basitarsus of legs 2 often excavated in its inner margin ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9–17 )................................................................................. 3 T8 without slender elongate lobes along its posterior margin to either side of the median posterior emargination (e.g. Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 , 17 View FIGURES 9–17 , 19, 24 View FIGURES 18–25 ); flanges may be present on ventral surface of T8.................................. 6 3. Posterior margin of T8 strongly asymmetrical especially when viewed from above; posterior margin of T7 broadly, shallowly and evenly emarginate; elytral apices broadly rounded (C> A or B); all FS simple; posterolateral corners of V7 produced and rounded; MPP with short narrow paired hooks with apices inclining inwards (Ballantyne 2001 Figs 1–3 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURES 3–5 )................................................................................................... asymmetria Ballantyne View in CoL Posterior margin of T8 symmetrical or nearly so ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 , 19, 24 View FIGURES 18–25 ); any asymmetry is in the paired lobes arising at each side of the MPP, and not an asymmetry of the entire posterior margin; posterior margin of T7 either scarcely emarginated and slightly bisinuate, or moderately deeply emarginated with acute posterolateral corners and straight anterior margin; elytral apices rounded or margin B obliquely truncate; FS1 slightly expanded in median area in decolor View in CoL ; posterolateral corners of V7 produced and rounded, or not produced and angulate; posterior margin of T8 deeply emarginated in middle area with posterolateral corners produced and rounded, or barely and very narrowly emarginated in median line only.......... 4
4. Posterolateral processes of V7 angulate, not or scarcely produced posteriorly ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 , 12 View FIGURES 9–17 ); posterior margin of V7 between PLP and MPP slightly sinuate; posterior margin of T7 with narrowed angulate corners and a small shallow median emargination (margin appears trisinuate); elytral apices obliquely truncate across most of their anterior (outer) margin (C); aedeagus dimensions B/A 0.6................................................................ tener Olivier Posterolateral View in CoL processes of V7 rounded obtuse, and produced posteriorly; posterior margin of V7 between PLP and MPP with moderately deep and rounded emarginations; posterior margin of T7 deeply emarginated in middle area with posterolateral corners produced and rounded; posterior margin of T7 not appearing trisinuate; elytral apices C rounded or truncate; aedeagus dimensions B/A> 0.6.................................................................................. 5
5. Dorsal surface entirely pale coloured (dark markings at tip of elytra may be present); pronotum without any pink markings; head and anterior margin of scape pale yellow with labrum dark brown; elytral apices rounded; projections on either side of median emargination of T8 relatively broad and apically rounded; aedeagus dimensions B/A 0.75.......... decolor Olivier Elytra View in CoL pale brown, semitransparent, with lateral margin paler than rest and pronotum often deep pinkish orange; if elytra pale then at least base and apex brown; head pale brown, with labrum slightly darker; elytral apex B obliquely truncate (Figs); projections to either side of median emargination of T8 slender and apically pointed; aedeagus dimensions B/A 0.85................................................................................................... bearni Olivier View in CoL
6. Deflexed elytral apex shortened (wider than long) ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 23 View FIGURES 18–25 ); tibiae 3 not expanded; basitarsi 3 not swollen; fine ventrally directed flanges on ventral surface of T8 absent; PLP separated from MPP by moderately deep circular emarginations ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–25 ); apices of PLP broad, flat, slightly obliquely truncate; posterior margin of T7 not emarginated and posterolateral corners not produced; lateral margins of T8 rounded.............. truncata Ballantyne Deflexed elytral apex not shortened (i.e. about as wide as long); tibiae 3 often expanded at apex and basitarsi 3 may be swollen ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26–34 ); fine ventrally directed flanges may be present on the ventral surface of T8 ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 17 View FIGURES 9–17 ); PLP separated from MPP by moderately deep circular emarginations or not; apices of PLP sometimes flat, slightly obliquely truncate; posterior margin of T7 usually emarginated and posterolateral corners produced; lateral margins of T8 rounded or straight and converging anteriorly............................................................. 7
7. Posterior end of elytra dimpled ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 20, 21 View FIGURES 18–25 ); wide deep emarginations separating elongate narrow PLP from MPP; apices of PLP narrow and rounded; posterolateral corners of T8 angulate and lateral margins converge anteriorly; posterolateral corners of T7 narrowed and may project and are often visible from beneath in the emarginations between PLP and MPP ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–25 )................................................... gelasina Ballantyne Posterior end of elytra not dimpled; either wide emarginations separating elongate PLP from MPP, or emarginations scarce; apices of PLP often slightly oblique, or PLP broadly rounded and scarcely produced; posterolateral corners of T8 angulate and lateral margins converge anteriorly or corners and lateral margins rounded; posterolateral corners of T7 not usually visible from beneath in the emarginations between PLP and MPP..................................................... 8
8. Posterolateral corners of V7 rounded or angulate, scarcely produced; MPP of V7 broad and apex almost squarely truncate or slightly rounded in ventral view and perpendicular to horizontal plane; median dorsal surface of MPP may be narrowly prolonged and apically emarginated.......................................................................... 9 PLP of V7 elongate, longer than wide, produced and apically obliquely truncated; MPP of V7 narrower and apex emarginated (emargination visible from beneath); median dorsal surface of MPP not developed ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 24, 25 View FIGURES 18–25 )...................................................................... masatakai Kawashima View in CoL , malaccae (Gorham) 1
9. Dorsal surface of MPP of V7 strongly prolonged and apically narrowly emarginated....................................................................... sulawesiensis Kawashima View in CoL ; valida Olivier sensu Ballantyne View in CoL (2001 Group 2:81) 2 Dorsal surface of MPP either without a median posterior projection or with a slight projection....................... 10
10. Elytral apices strongly deflexed ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–34 ); posterior margin of outer area of elytral apex grooved; LO in V7 well separated in the middle ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Figs 27, 31 View FIGURES 26–34 ).... valida Olivier sensu Ballantyne (2001) Groups View in CoL 1, 3 3 Elytral apices not strongly deflexed ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ); posterior margin of outer area of elytral apex not grooved; LO in V7 contiguous in the middle ( Ballantyne et al. 2011 Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) maipo Ballantyne View in CoL
Footnotes 1. These species are not further distinguished here; Ballantyne (2001) identified malaccae in four distinct morphological groups from peninsular Malaysia, Sarawak, Thailand and Indonesia (Borneo); Kawashima (2003) did not align masatakai View in CoL with any of these groups and malaccae and masatakai View in CoL are distinguished here by the occurrence of masatakai View in CoL on the island of Sulawesi. 2. Ballantyne (2001) distinguished a group of specimens of valida View in CoL from peninsular Malaysia at Selangor, Sarawak and Indonesia (Bali) with a median posterior projection of the dorsal surface of MPP. 3. Ballantyne (2001) distinguished a single specimen from peninsular Malaysia as group 3.
Remarks. Two species of flashing fireflies in Malaysia both belonging to the genus Pteroptyx Olivier are similar, and their inconsistent identification in various publications, (not least those of the first author), is addressed and resolved here. The species are Pteroptyx tener Olivier , a mass synchronising species that is the basis for the tourist development involving firefly watching on the Selangor River in Western peninsular Malaysia, and Pteroptyx bearni Olivier , a non synchronising species sometimes found in the same habitats as tener . The problems in identification have arisen primarily because Pteroptyx bearni was first redescribed without examination or description of a type, which was not located in the initial investigations ( Ballantyne & McLean 1970). Subsequent publications, including depictions of this species on Malaysian stamps, assumed this characterisation to be definitive and are discussed below.
Ballantyne located in the Pic collection from the Natural History Museum Paris a single specimen which can be regarded as a surviving syntype of P. bearni and it is described here, and issues covering identifications of this species and P. tener are addressed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pteroptyx
Ballantyne, Lesley A. & Lambkin, Christine L. 2013 |
Pteroptyx
Ballantyne, L. & Fu, X. H. & Shih, C. H. & Cheng C. Y. & Yiu, V. 2011: 8 |
Ballantyne, L. A. 1987: 117 |
Ballantyne, L. A. 1987: 171 |
Ballantyne, L. A. & McLean, M. R. 1970: 223 |
McDermott, F. A. 1959: 10 |
Olivier, E. 1909: 319 |
Olivier, E. & Pic, M. 1909: 139 |
Olivier, E. 1907: 55 |
Olivier, E. 1902: 72 |