Dianthus virgineus var. tergestinus Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: 47, pl. 266 fig. 5049β?. 1842-1844. [1844 publ. 1842-1844]

Domina, Gianniantonio, Astuti, Giovanni, Bacchetta, Gianluigi, Barone, Giulio, Resetnik, Ivana, Terlevic, Ana, Thiebaut, Melanie & Peruzzi, Lorenzo, 2021, Typification of 14 names in the Dianthus virgineus group (Caryophyllaceae), PhytoKeys 187, pp. 1-14 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.187.75534

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E00D1489-A393-5BC1-99F9-A8F9892264FC

treatment provided by

PhytoKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Dianthus virgineus var. tergestinus Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: 47, pl. 266 fig. 5049β?. 1842-1844. [1844 publ. 1842-1844]
status

 

Dianthus virgineus var. tergestinus Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: 47, pl. 266 fig. 5049β?. 1842-1844. [1844 publ. 1842-1844] View in CoL

Dianthus tergestinus D. tergestinus (Rchb.) A.Kern., Sched. Fl. Exs. Austro-Hung. 2: 71. 1883.

Dianthus caryophyllus tergestinus D. caryophyllus var. tergestinus (Rchb.) Tanfani in Caruel, Fl. Ital. 9(2): 283. 1892.

Dianthus sylvestris tergestinus D. sylvestris subsp. tergestinus (Rchb.) Hayek, Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih. 30(1, 2): 247. 1924. Ind. Loc.: none [but Trieste, Italy, can be easily inferred from the epithet “tergestinus” that means "from Trieste"].

Type.

(lectotype here designated): Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: pl. 266 fig. 5049β. 1842-1844.

Note.

The main text (Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: 47. 1842-1844. [1844 publ. 1842-1844]) lacks a written diagnosis or description, and, in any case, it is not clear if the plate was published simultaneously with the main text. Stafleu and Cowan (1983) reports that the volume 6 was published between 1842 and 1844, even though the title page shows 1844. However, this name was validly published on plate CCLXVI (= 266) by an illustration with analysis (Arts. 38.7 and 38.8 of the ICN), which is obviously part of the original material.

This taxon is considered as a subspecies of D. sylvestris by Vangjeli (2015), Brullo and Guarino (2017), Bartolucci et al. (2018), Peruzzi et al. (2019), and Nikolić (2020). It differs from D. sylvestris subsp. sylvestris by having a poorly developed mucro of the epicalyx scales and entire petals. Its distribution (Trieste area and along the north-eastern Adriatic coast), separated from the main range of D. sylvestris subsp. sylvestris , is compatible with the rank of subspecies.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Caryophyllales

Family

Caryophyllaceae

Genus

Dianthus

Loc

Dianthus virgineus var. tergestinus Rchb., Icon. Fl. Germ. Helv. 6: 47, pl. 266 fig. 5049β?. 1842-1844. [1844 publ. 1842-1844]

Domina, Gianniantonio, Astuti, Giovanni, Bacchetta, Gianluigi, Barone, Giulio, Resetnik, Ivana, Terlevic, Ana, Thiebaut, Melanie & Peruzzi, Lorenzo 2021
2021
Loc

Dianthus caryophyllus tergestinus

Tanfani 1892
1892