Ligyrus (Ligyrus) nasutus ( Burmeister, 1847 )

López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc, 2022, Cladistic analysis reveals polyphyly of Tomarus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae): new classification and taxonomic revision, Zootaxa 5211 (1), pp. 1-119 : 46-47

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5211.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5754769C-B747-4714-BDD9-7D5509D48BEB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7383763

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A209493B-FD72-FFAF-AFA6-19C1FF55BDB0

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ligyrus (Ligyrus) nasutus ( Burmeister, 1847 )
status

 

Ligyrus (Ligyrus) nasutus ( Burmeister, 1847) revised status

( Figs. 1F View FIGURE 1 , 15N View FIGURE 15 , 18F View FIGURE 18 , 26C View FIGURE 26 ; 34 View FIGURE 34 )

Podalgus nasutus Burmeister, 1847: 120 . Original combination.

Female lectotype designated by Endrödi (1969: 59) (MLUH) “nasutus* / Yucat. / Berg // Lectotypus / Ligyrus / ( Podalgus ) / nasutus Burm / Endrody” Type locality: Guatemala and Yucatan. Although Guatemala is mentioned in the original description no paralectotype was found.

Ligyrus pygidialis Bates, 1888: 317 . Original combination. Male lectotype designated by Endrödi (1969: 59) ( BMNH) “LECTO- / TYPE // Type // B.C.A., Col.,II(2) / Ligyrus / pygidialis. // N. Yucatan. / Gaumer. // Ligyrus / pygidialis / Bates ♂ // Lectotypus / Ligyrus / pygidialis / Bat. / Endrody”. Female paralectotype ( BMNH) “PARA- / LECTO- / TYPE // Type // B.C.A., Col.,II(2) / Ligyrus / pygidialis. // N. Yucatan. / Gaumer. // Ligyrus / pygidialis / Bates ♀ ”. Male paralectotype ( BMNH) “PARA- / LECTO- / TYPE // B.C.A., Col.,II(2) / Ligyrus / pygidialis. // N. Yucatan. / Gaumer.”. There are 13 syntypes which should be labeled as paralectotypes at MNHN ( EC7079-7091 ). The following are considered invalid types as the species was not originally described with paratypes : Two male paratypes and two female paratypes ( USNM) “ Yucatan / Temax / Gaumer // USNM / PARATYPE / 49710 // Ligyrus / pygidialis / Bates / Paratype ” .

Description. Habitus as in Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 . Length 14.8–17.4 mm; humeral width 8.31–9.2 mm. Color dark reddish brown. Head: Frons deeply rugopunctate, with large and sparse punctures, nearly smooth on vertex, with only sparse, small punctures. Frontoclypeal region with a bilobed, complete carina ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ). Ocular canthus acute, with 10 ventral setae. Clypeal surface rugopunctate to transversely rugose, striae denser than those on frons. Clypeus triangular, base 3.5 times wider than apex ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ). Clypeal teeth triangular, separated by 1 diameter tooth ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ). Mandible with 2 apical and 1 lateral, widely rounded tooth, tooth 1 longer and narrower than tooth 2. Maxilla rectangular; galea with 3 dorsal teeth. Apex of labrum straight. Interocular distance 3.5 times an eye width. Antennal club very long. Pronotum: Surface with large, dense punctures. Apex without tubercle (with a small swelling) or fovea. Elytra: First interval punctate, punctures similar to other intervals. Inner surface of apex with small transverse tubercles forming about 70 parallel lines. Abdomen: Apex of tergite IV with a diagonal line of 11 transverse, parallel, short carinae. Pygidial surface with small punctures, denser on base and anterior corners. Surface in lateral view strongly convex (male) to flat (female). Legs: Protibia tridentate, basal tooth slightly distant from others. Protibial surface sparsely punctate. Protarsus of male simple, inner claw simple. Metatibia strongly contracted at apex. Apex of metatibia entire, with 15–20 spinules. Female genitalia: Subcoxite subrectangular (2 times wider than long). Coxite subrectangular (wider than long); surface strongly concave. Subcoxite wider and shorter than coxite. Male genitalia: Spiculum gastrale thin, apex truncate. Parameres with sides nearly parallel, lateral ventral teeth long ( Figs. 15N View FIGURE 15 , 18F View FIGURE 18 ). Internal sac with lamellar spiny belt long (5 times longer than copulatory lamellae); accessory lamella thickened, irregular.

Diagnosis. Ligyrus nasutus can be recognized by the frontal carina bilobed, not interrupted ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ); pronotum without tubercle or fovea, with a basal small swelling ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ); pronotal punctation deep and large; metatibia elongate with apex strongly narrowed; parameres with sides nearly parallel; lateral ventral teeth long ( Figs. 15N View FIGURE 15 , 18F View FIGURE 18 ); internal sac with accessory lamella thick and irregular (as in L. allonasutus , Fig. 21E View FIGURE 21 ); coxite of female strongly concave.

Taxonomic remarks. Ligyrus nasutus was described with two females, one from Yucatán and the other from Guatemala. Ligyrus pygidialis was described by Bates (1888) based on a large series of males and females from Yucatán ( Mexico), which according to his description were different to L. nasutus by the shape of the frontoclypeal carina divided at middle. It is not clear if Bates (1888) reviewed the type specimen of L. nasutus of Yucatán, but he cited additional specimens from Guerrero ( Mexico) and San Jerónimo ( Guatemala). Endrödi (1969) chose the female from Yucatán (in poor condition) as the lectotype for L. nasutus and considered L. pygidialis as an “aberration”. He only described and illustrated the parameres from the populations from western Mexico and Guatemala to Costa Rica but did not illustrate the parameres of the Yucatán populations, even though the lectotype of L. nasutus was from this region. After his work, the name L. nasutus was widely used for supposedly a unique species with wide distribution, but there was confusion since the original description of Burmeister included two female specimens from different species as types for L. nasutus . In the present work, the lectotypes of L. nasutus and L. pygidialis were analyzed in comparison with additional specimens from the region of Yucatán and compared with specimens from other regions of Mexico and Guatemala to Panama. Clear differences were found between the specimens from Yucatán region and the other populations, mainly in the shape of the frontoclypeal carina, pronotum, and parameres, which is supported by the biogeographic identity of the region of Yucatán. Following the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999), as the lectotype of L. nasutus is from Yucatán, only the populations of this region correspond to this species, and the remaining populations from western Mexico to Panama are named in the present work as L. allonasutus .

Distribution. Ligyrus nasutus is restricted to the Yucatán region of Mexico, in the states of Campeche, Yucatán, Quintana Roo, and eastern Chiapas at elevations below 50 m.

Locality records ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ). 62 examined specimens from BMNH, CNIN, EMAC, IEXA, UNSM, USNM. Some data from Ratcliffe et al. (2013). MEXICO (81). Campeche (16): Calkini; Campeche (5 mi. N); Grutas Xtacambilxunán. Chiapas (1): Palenque. Quintana Roo (12): Cancún; Carrillo Puerto (20–24 km N); Cobá; Nuevo X-Can; Playa del Carmen (10.9 km S). Yucatán (51): Chichén Itzá; Conkal; Mérida; Piste (12 km N); Santa Helena; Temax.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Dynastidae

SubFamily

Dynastinae

Genus

Ligyrus

SubGenus

Ligyrus

Loc

Ligyrus (Ligyrus) nasutus ( Burmeister, 1847 )

López-García, Margarita M. & Deloya, Cuauhtémoc 2022
2022
Loc

Ligyrus pygidialis

Endrodi, S. 1969: 59
Bates, H. W. 1888: 317
1888
Loc

Podalgus nasutus

Burmeister, H. 1847: 120
1847
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF