Notodelphys caerulea Thorell, 1859
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4591176 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EF48-3A2C-FF4D-FB05FA92FAEB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Notodelphys caerulea Thorell, 1859 |
status |
|
Notodelphys caerulea Thorell, 1859
( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 )
Syn.: Notodelphys hatlassae Monniot C., 1981 new synonym.
Material examined. 2 ♀♀ (MNHN-IU-2015-3) and 1 dissected ♀ (figured) from Ascidia virginea M̹ller, 1776, Gulf of Gascogne, EVOHE, Stn 236, October–November 2009; 1 ♀ (MNHN-IU-2015-11) from A. virginea , Gulf of Gascogne, EVOHE 09, Stn 112, October–November 2009.
Supplementary description of female. Body ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ) 2.97 mmlong. Freeurosome 5-segmented: anal somite ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ) 168×198 μm. Caudalramus ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ) 238×68 μm, about 3.5 times longer than wide and 1.4 times as long as anal somite, covered by fine setules more densely on outer and inner surfaces than on dorsal and ventral surfaces; outer seta located at 60% of ramus length.
Rostrum ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ) elongated, tapering towards pointed apex. Antennule 15-segmented. Antenna ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ) with 2 large subequal setae on basis representing exopod.
Mandible ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ) with 4 major teeth on coxal gnathobase, second distal tooth acute; endopod with 3 setaeon first segment and 9 setaeon second. Maxillule ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ) with 10 setae on precoxal arthrite, 1 seta on coxal endite, 2 unequal setae on coxal epipodite, 3 setae (including small proximal seta) on inner margin of basis, and 4 setaeon exopod; endopod 2-segmented with 1 inner seta on first segment and 4 setae on second segment. Maxilla ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ) with 4, 1, 2, and 3 setae respectively on first to fourth endites of syncoxa; basis with strong claw plus 2 setae; endopod with 1, 1, and 4 setae, respectively, on first to third segments; one of setae on third endopodal segment small, setule-like. Maxilliped 3-segmented with 10, 1, and 3 setae, respectively, on first to third segments.
Legs 1–4 as in generic diagnosis. Leg 5 ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ) 2-segmented. Protopod defined from somite at base, produced into elongated lateral process tipped by naked seta and ornamented with about 10 spinules along distal inner margin. Exopodal segment 31×35 μm, armed with 1 spine and 1 naked seta and ornamented with 3 or 4 spinules on inner margin near base of spine.
Remarks. When describing Notodelphys hatlassae Monniot, 1981 , Monniot (1981) apparently overlooked N. caerulea as he did not make comparisons between these two species despite their close similarity. The form of leg 5 in these two species, as illustrated by Thorell (1859), Sars (1921), Monniot (1981), and in the present account ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ), does not differ significantly. In addition, the position of the lateral seta on the caudal ramus, the proportional lengths of the caudal ramus and anal somite, and the shape of the rostrum are all identical in the present material and in Monniot’s specimens. These two species also utilize the same host, Ascidia virginea . Notodelphys hatlassae Monniot, 1981 is here treated as a junior subjective synonym of N. caerulea Thorell, 1859 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |