Photuris Dejean, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1749323 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/486D87CD-FFB8-FFD7-0E9E-BD4BC63CFBAA |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Photuris Dejean, 1833 |
status |
|
Photuris Dejean, 1833 View in CoL ( Figure 5 C – F View Figure 5 )
This genus can be diagnosed by clypeus connate or fused to frons, head wider than distance between hypomeres, tarsal claw with anterior half bifid; and lanterns present on abdominal sterna VI and VII. Male flash patterns are very important in species discrimination (reviewed in Lloyd 2018), as they seem to evolve more quickly than morphology, and rather predictably among geographic regions (discussed in Faust 2017). However, as far as we are aware, comparative studies integrating DNA, morphology and flash pattern variation are lacking, and species identification based on morphology seems reasonable at the local scale. Males usually have greater eyes and lanterns, but smaller mandibles, than females, but sexes are otherwise very similar ( Souto et al. 2019). Lloyd (2018) published a monumental work detailing morphology and flash patterns of North American Photuris species. Rosa (2007) described the immature stages of Photuris fulvipes (Blanchard 1837) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |