Poterium ancistroides f. minor Pau ex Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929

Nualart, Neus, Soriano, Ignasi, Prieto, David Pérez & Ibáñez, Neus, 2021, Catalogue and typification of the Moroccan taxa published by Carlos Pau, Phytotaxa 519 (1), pp. 1-94 : 63-70

Poterium ancistroides f. minor Pau ex Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 225 (1930a), in sched.

= Sanguisorba ancistroides (Desf.) Ces.

Ind. loc.:—“ Hab. in fissuris rupium calc. supra Cala Blanca ( Melilla) , ad 200 m. alt.; 7 aprilis”

Lectotype (designated here):— In fissuris rupium calc. supra Cala Blanca ( Melilla) , 200 m, 7 April 1929, Font Quer 225-1929 (lectotype BC 98063 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98063 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 72411 [photo!], MA 56760 !, MA 56761 !, MPU 004717 [photo!], P 00124455 [photo!])

Notes:—The description on the label is authored by Font Quer, so the name should be attributed to “Pau ex Font Quer” as indicated by Navarro & Muñoz Garmendia (1998). The MPU and P specimens bear an original label handwritten by Maire as Sanguisorba minor var. font-queri Maire ; this name was proposed by Maire (1949) using these specimens as original material. For this reason, the MPU specimen was labelled as holotype of Maire’s variety by Madaure, Durand, and Loup in 2004. This var. font-queri should be considered as an illegitimate name, because it is based on the type of a previously published name (in this case f. minor ), as stated by Art. 52.1 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018). The BC specimen was identified as Sanguisorba ancistroides by Romo in 1995.

1,2,3 Prunella africana Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 539 (1928), in sched.

= Prunella laciniata (L.) L.

Ind. loc.:—“ Hab. in quercetis suberis, juxta Badú (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1500 m. alt., solo argilloso; 5 julii” Lectotype (designated here):—In quercetis suberis, juxta Badú (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1500 m, 5 July 1927, Font Quer 539-1927 (lectotype BC 48430 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC48430 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17262 [photo!], GDA 31796 [photo!], MA 101595 !, MPU 006392 [photo!], MPU 006393 [photo!])

Note:— The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013 .

1,2,3 Prunella laciniata var. macrostachya Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 337 (1929), in sched.

= Prunella laciniata (L.) L.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in argillosis, pr. Xauen, 700 m. alt.; 9 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In argillosis, pr. Xauen, 700 m, 9 June 1928, Font Quer 337-1928 (lectotype BC 48395 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC48395 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 18094 [photo!], MA 101637 !, MPU 006613 [photo!], MPU 006614 [photo!])

Note:—The BC specimen was identified as P. laciniata by Navarro in 2005.

1,3 Pulicaria atlantica Pau in Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 12: 342 (1924a)

= Pulicaria odora (L.) Rchb.

Ind. loc.:—“Larache”

Type:—not seen

1,3 Pyrethrum pallidum var. longipectinatum Pau ex Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 671 (1928), in sched.

≡ Leucanthemopsis longipectinata (Font Quer) Heywood

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in saxosis juxta collem Tizzi Iffri (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m. alt., solo arenaceo”

Lectotype (designated here):—In saxosis juxta collem Tizzi Iffri (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m, 7 June 1927, Font Quer 671-1927 (lectotype BC 30403 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC30403 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 70887 [photo!], GDA 5232 )

Notes:—On the original label,Font Quer proposed two alternative names“ Pyrethrum pallidum var. longipectinatum Pau ” and “ Leucanthemum longipectinatum F. Q., in litt.” with a single description. Later authors ( Emberger & Maire 1929, Sennen & Mauricio 1934, Heywood 1975) have taken as a basionym the name and authorship of Font Quer. The BC specimen was labelled as Leucanthemopsis longipectinata by Vogt and Oberprieler in 1995.

1,2 Pyrethrum radicans f. leucoglossum Pau in Sennen & Mauricio, Cat. Fl. Rif Orient. 60 (1934), nom. nud.

= Leucanthemopsis pectinata ( L.) G.López & C. E.Jarvis

Note:—The accepted name follows Vogt (2002).

1 Pyrethrum webbianum f. herculea Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 446 (1930a), in sched.

= Tanacetum corymbosum ( L.) Sch. Bip. s.l.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in quercetis suberis montis Djebel Tersetx (Beni Seddat), 1600 m. alt.; 2 julii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In quercetis suberis montis Djebel Tersetx (Beni Seddat), 1600 m, 2 July 1929,

Font Quer 446-1929 ( lectotype BC 98250 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98250 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 72594 [photo!], MA 128659 !)

Note:—The MA specimen was identified as “ Tanacetum corymbosum subsp. achilleae ( L.) Voith-Drescher” (unpublished name) by Voith-Drescher in 1986.

1,3 Quercus lusitanica var. rhiphaea Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 132 (1928), in sched.

= Quercus faginea subsp. maroccana (Braun-Blanq. & Maire) F.M.Vázquez & Coombes

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in declivibus umbrosis montis Yebel Sidel (Atlante rhiphaeo), solo schistoso, 1850 m. alt.; 3 julii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In declivibus umbrosis montis Yebel Sidel (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1850 m, 3 July 1927, Font Quer 132-1927 (lectotype BC 58008 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC58008 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 15753 [photo!]*, GDA 29433 [photo!], MA 54744 !, MPU 006350 [photo!])

Notes:— Vázquez et al. (2018) designated as type the specimen “ BC 015753”, but there are no Quercus L. specimens at Herb. BC with this number. In fact, the reference corresponds to a sheet of this taxon preserved at Herb. BCN, a collection that is not mentioned in the methodology of the paper. Therefore, this lectotypification is not valid, and should be superseded according to Art. 9.16 of Turland et al. (2018). The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU one as isotype by Sennedot and Scouppe in 2006. The BC specimen was identified as Q. canariensis Willd. by Pérez Latorre in 2005. According to Vázquez et al. (2018) these plants are morphologically similar to Q. canariensis , but an in-depth study of its pubescence allows the segregation of Q. canariensis s. s.

3 Ranunculus aquatilis var. renifolius Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 204 (1928), in sched.

= Ranunculus peltatus subsp. saniculifolius (Viv.) C.D.K.Cook

Ind. loc.:—“ Hab. in lacusculo juxta collem Tizzi Iffri posito (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m. alt.; 8 junii” Lectotype (designated here):—In lacusculo juxta collem Tizzi Iffri posito (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m, 8 June 1927, Font Quer 204-1927 (lectotype BC 1331 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC1331 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17292 [photo!], GDA 35511 [photo!], MA 40369 !, MPU 006340 [photo!])

Note:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU specimen as isotype by Sennedot and Scouppe in 2006.

1,3 Ranunculus bipinnatus Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 209 (1928), in sched.

= Ranunculus bulbosus subsp. aleae (Willk.) Rouy & Foucaud

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in pratis juxta collem Tizzi Iffri dictum (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m. alt.; 8 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In pratis juxta collem Tizzi Iffri dictum (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m, 8 June 1927, Font Quer 209-1927 (lectotype BC 1281 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC1281 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17290 [photo!], GDA 35366 [photo!], MA 41238 !, MPU 006339 [photo!])

Note:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU voucher as isotype by Sennedot and Scouppe in 2006.

1,3 Ranunculus bulbosus var. apiifolius Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 208 (1928), in sched.

= Ranunculus bulbosus subsp. aleae (Willk.) Rouy & Foucaud

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in argillosis humidis, c. Targuist, 1000 m. alt.; 1 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In argillosis humidis, c. Targuist, 1000 m, 1 June 1927, Font Quer 208-1927 (lectotype BC 996 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC996 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17291 [photo!], GDA 35375 [photo!], MA 41144 !, MPU 003407 [photo!])

Note:— The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013 .

1,3 Ranunculus peltatus var. rhiphaeus Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 205 (1928), in sched.

= Ranunculus peltatus subsp. saniculifolius (Viv.) C.D.K.Cook

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in lacusculo juxta collem Tizzi Iffri posito (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m. alt.”

Lectotype (designated here):—In lacusculo juxta collem Tizzi Iffri posito (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1800 m, 20 July 1927, Font Quer 205-1927 (lectotype BC 1378 ![https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC1378 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17293 [photo!], GDA 35510 [photo!], MA 40370 !, MPU 006337 [photo!])

Notes:— Carrasco (1975) reports this taxon as Ranunculus rifeus Pau & Font Quer , as it is cited in Sennen (1936a: 137). The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU voucher as isotype by Sennedot and Scouppe in 2006.

1,3 Ranunculus repentifolius Pau in Vidal, Bol. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 22: 56 (1922)

= Ranunculus bulbosus subsp. aleae (Willk.) Rouy & Foucaud

Ind. loc.:—“Xauen”

Holotype:—Xauen, 13 June 1921, Vidal s.n. ( MA 40942 ! [http://colecciones.rjb.csic.es/#cardAdv. php?CatalogNumber=MA-01-00040942])

1,3 Ranunculus tripartitus var. minoriflorus Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 155 (1930a), in sched.

= Ranunculus tripartitus DC.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in aquis, c. Sidi Mohfi (Beni Seddat), 1750 m. alt.; 14 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In aquis, c. Sidi Mohfi (Beni Seddat), 1750 m, 14 June 1929, Font Quer 155-1929 (lectotype BC 98206 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98206 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 72401 [photo!], G 00424838 [photo!], GDA 35057 [photo!], MA 40314 !, MPU 003408 [photo!])

Note:— The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013 .

1,2,3 Reseda lanceolata var. trifida Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 245 (1928), in sched.

= Reseda lanceolata subsp. constricta (Lange) Valdés Berm.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in incultis, c. Targuist, 1000 m. alt.; 30 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In incultis, c. Targuist, 1000 m, 30 June 1927, Font Quer 245-1927 (lectotype BC 5954 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC5954 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17300 [photo!], GDA 27586 [photo!], MA 50720 !, MPU 006324 [photo!], MPU 006325 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and MPU specimens as isotypes by Sennedot and Scouppe in 2006. The BC specimen was identified as R. lanceolata subsp. constricta by Valdés in 1995.

1 Rhamnus alaternus f. tangerinus Pau in Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 12: 303 (1924a)

= Rhamnus alaternus L. subsp. alaternus

Ind. loc.:—“Yebel Quebir”

Type:—not seen

Note:—The accepted name follows Rivas Martínez & Pizarro (2015).

1 Rhamnus oleoides f. latiorifolia Pau in Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 12: 303 (1924a)

= Rhamnus lycioides subsp. atlantica (Murb.) Jahand. & Maire

Ind. loc.:—“Tetuán, al pie de Beni Hozmar”

Holotype:— Tetuan, al pie de Beni Hozmar, May 1921, Pau ( MA 76682 [photo!] [http://colecciones.rjb.csic. es/#cardAdv.php?CatalogNumber=MA-01-00076682])

Note:—Original material was identified as R. oleoides subsp. atlantica Murb. by Rivas Martínez & Pizarro in 2000.

1 Rhus pentaphylla f. brevipes Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 375 (1928), in sched.

= Searsia pentaphylla (Desf.) F.A.Barkley ex Moffett

Ind. loc.:—“ Hab. in declivibus calc. littoralis rhiphaei, pr. Torres de Alcalá (Beni Bu-Frah), 50 m. alt.; 5 junii” Lectotype (designated here):—In declivibus calc. littoralis rhiphaei, pr. Torres de Alcalá (Beni Bu-Frah), 50 m, 5 June 1927, Font Quer 375-1927 (lectotype BC 13456 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC13456 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 16656 [photo!], MA 76060 !, MPU 006300 [photo!])

1,2,3 Rosa pouzinii f. mauritii Sennen & Pau ex R.Keller in Maire, Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 26(7): 204 (1935)

= Rosa pouzinii Tratt.

Ind. loc.:—“Plantes d’Espagne, nº 8781”

Lectotype (designated here):— Maroc: Metalza, Aïn-Zora, base du Tendri, 1050 m, 26 May 1933, Sennen & Mauricio 8781 (lectotype BC-Sennen 823966! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC823966 .jpg]; isolectotypes BC 141727 !, MA 57673 !, MPU 009319 [photo!])

Notes:—The specimen was distributed in the exsiccata Plantes d’Espagne 1933 nº 8781, and originally labelled as “ R. pouzinii var. mauritii Pau & Sennen ” without a description. The first description of this taxon was done by Keller in Maire (1935) at the rank of form, and one year later by Sennen (1936b: 189) as var. mauritii Sennen (without mentioning Pau). This latter name is the one that appears in Silvestre (2002) and APD (2020). Carrasco (1975) mentions it as R. pouzinni var. mauritti Pau & Sennen with the reference to Sennen (1936a: 95). The BC and MA specimens were identified as R. pouzinii by Silvestre in 1995.

2,3 Rosa pouzinii var. parvipetala Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 267 (1928), in sched., nom. nud.

=§ Rosa × toddiae Wolley-Dod [ Rosa micrantha Borrer ex Sm. × R. canina L.]

Note:—The accepted name follows Silvestre (2002), although in APD (2020) this variety is linked to Rosa pouzinii .

1,2,3 Rosa pouzinii var. yebalica Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 167 (1929), in sched.

=§ Rosa × toddiae Wolley-Dod [ Rosa micrantha Borrer ex Sm. × R. canina L.]

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in quercetis ilicis montis Kelti (Yebala), 1800 m. alt.; 18 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In quercetis ilicis montis Kelti (Yebala), 1800 m, 18 June 1928, Font Quer 167- 1928 (lectotype BC 20777 [upper left-hand specimen!] [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC20777 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 18018 [photo!], GDA 38329 [photo!], MA 57668 !, MPU 006414 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC sheet bears a revision label by Silvestre in 1996, who identified two taxa: 4 samples as R. micrantha × R. canina , and one as R. micrantha . According to this revision, Silvestre (2002) synonymizes var. yebalica pro parte under both taxa. APD (2020) includes this variety under R. pouzinii . According to Silvestre & Montserrat (1998), R. micrantha leaflets are +densely glandular beneath, while the hybrid has only a few glands. The sparsely glandular leaflets mentioned in the description of var. yebalica are therefore close to those of the hybrid. The selected lectotype among the four samples in the BC sheet is the biggest one with flowers.

1,2,3 Rosa sicula var. maroccana Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 268 (1928), in sched., pro var., nom. illeg.

=§ [ Rosa sicula Tratt. × R. canina L.]

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in cedretis montis Iguermalez (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1850 m. alt.; 18 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In cedretis montis Iguermalez (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1850 m, 18 June 1928, Font Quer 268-1928 (lectotype BC 20397 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC20397 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17298 [photo!], GDA 38337 [photo!], MA 57147 !, MPU 006318 [photo!], MPU 006319 [photo!])

Notes:—This name should be considered illegitimate according to Art. 53.4 ( Turland et al. 2018), since there exists a previously published homonym by Magnier (1884: 69). The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as Rosa sicula × R. canina by Silvestre in 1995. In APD (2020) this variety is linked to R. sicula , but according to Silvestre (2002) it should be synonymized under Rosa sicula × R. canina .

Ruta chalepensis [unranked] longirrostris Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 358 (1928), in sched. = Ruta angustifolia Pers.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in saxosis calc. Yebel Malmusi (Littore rhiphaeo), 50 m. alt.; 13 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In saxosis calc. Yebel Malmusi (Littore rhiphaeo), 50 m, 13 May 1927, Font

Quer 358-1927 ( lectotype BC 13089 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC13089 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN

17313!, MA 73622!, MA 73623!)

Notes:—The name was originally published as “ var. vel fma.” The BC specimen was identified as R. angustifolia by Martinell in 2004. The accepted name follows San Miguel (2015).

1 Ruta chalepensis f. tetuanensis Pau in Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 12: 302 (1924a)

= Ruta angustifolia Pers.

Ind. loc.:—“Beni Hozmar”

Lectotype (designated here):—Beni Hozmar, 8 May 1921, Pau s.n. (lectotype MA 73620 ! [http://colecciones.rjb. csic.es/#cardAdv.php?CatalogNumber=MA-01-00073620]; isolectotype BC 13104 !)

Notes:—The BC specimen collected from Beni Hozmar in 1921 was labelled by Pau as “ R. chalepensis var. hosmariensis Pau ”, but this name was never published. According to Pau (1924a) all plants of Ruta genus from Beni Hozmar belong to the forma tetuanensis . The BC specimen was identified by Martinell as R. angustifolia in 2004. The accepted name follows San Miguel (2015).

1,2,3 Sagina sabuletorum var. longifolia Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 77 (1929), in sched.

= Sagina sabuletorum Lange

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in humidis, juxta Xauen, 700 m. alt.; 11 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In humidis, juxta Xauen, 700 m, 11 May 1928, Font Quer 77-1928 (lectotype BC 10978 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC10978 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 17472 [photo!], GDA 2023 [photo!], MA 35111 !, MPU 006438 [photo!])

Note:— The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013 .

1,2,3 Sagina saginoides var. stenophylla Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 129 (1930a), in sched., nom. nud.

= Sagina saginoides ( L.) H.Karst. subsp. saginoides

Note:—The name was published in an Iter Maroccanum label without any description.

1,2,3 Salvia haematodes var. atlantica Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1930 nº 569 (1932), in sched.

= Salvia mouretii Batt. & Pit.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in argillosis, pr. El Araix; 25 martii”

Lectotype (designated here):— In argillosis, pr. El Araix, 25 March 1930, Font Quer 569-1930 (lectotype BC 98301 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98301 .jpg]; isolectotypes BC 810824 !, BCN 73762 [photo!], G 00435373 [photo!], GAT 2602683 [photo!], GDA 32375 [photo!], MA 103797 !)

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. In BC there are two sheets of original material; the chosen lectotype is the one in better condition. The BC specimens were identified as S. mouretii by Rosúa in 1986 ( BC 98301 ) and by Sáez in 1997 ( BC 810824 ) .

1,2,3 Salvia pluripartita Pau in Mem. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 12: 374 (1924a)

= Salvia barrelieri Etl.

Ind. loc.:—“Beni Hozmar”

Lectotype (designated here):—Beni Hozmar, 8 May 1921, Pau s.n. (lectotype MA 103844 !; isolectotypes BC 47666 !, MA 103845 !)

Notes:—The BC specimen was identified as S. barrelieri by Rosúa in 1986. Rosúa (1987: 188) mentions as lectotypes two sheets from Beni Hozmar ( BC 98302! and BC 98303!), both collected according to him on 27 May 1924. But in fact, both specimens were collected in 1930 and distributed in Iter Marrocanum 1930. The first one from Beni Hozmar, nº 570, was collected in 27 May 1930 and the second one, nº 571, from Larache on 30 May 1930, some years after the publication of the taxon by Pau (1924a). Because original material exists (samples from Beni Hozmar collected by Pau during his trip in Yebala in 1921), this typification has to be superseded according to Art. 9.19 ( Turland et al. 2018). The specimen selected as lectotype bears the original label of this trip.

1 Salvia verbenaca var. ovatocrenata Pau in Vidal, Asoc. Esp. Progr. Ci. Congr. Cádiz 6: 157 (1928) (“ ovatocrenatae ”)

= Salvia verbenaca L.

Ind. loc.:—“Medik”

Type:—not seen

1,2,3 Sarothamnus baeticus var. africanus Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 286 (1928), in sched.

= Cytisus arboreus (Desf.) DC.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in quercetis collis Ferrah dictis, supra Targuist, 1200 m. alt.; 29 junii”

Lectotype (designated by Auvray & Malecot 2013: 110):—In quercetis collis Ferrah dictis, supra Targuist, 1200 m, 29 June 1927, Font Quer 286-1927 (lectotype BC 13572! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC 13572. jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 70199 [photo!], MA 60447!*, G *, GDA 34641 [photo!], MPU 010037 [photo!]*) Notes:—In their lectotypfication Auvray & Malecot (2013) wrongly cited the variety of Pau, naming it “ Cytisus baeticus var. africanus Pau & Font Quer ” as in Carrasco (1975) and Sennen (1936a: 108). Auvray & Malecot (2013) also mentioned as isolectotypes the specimens at MA, G, and MPU. The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as C. arboreus subsp. baeticus by Talavera in 1995, but Auvray & Malecot (2013) and APD (2020) do not accept any infraspecific taxa.

1,2,3 Sarothamnus baeticus var. tetuanensis Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 180 (1929), in sched.

= Cytisus arboreus (Desf.) DC.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in quercetis suberis vallis Lau, solo siliceo, 500 m. alt.; 12 majii”

Lectotype (designated by Auvray & Malecot 2013: 110):—In quercetis suberis vallis Lau, 500 m, 12 May 1928, Font Quer 180-1928 (lectotype MA 60451 ! [http://colecciones.rjb.csic.es/#cardAdv.php?CatalogNumber=MA-01-00060451]; isolectotypes BC 13571 !*, BCN 71171 [photo!], GDA 34643 [photo!], MPU 006411 [photo!]*, MPU 006412 [photo!]*)

Notes:—As in the previous case, Auvray & Malecot (2013) wrongly cited the variety of Pau; they reported “ Cytisus baeticus var. tetuanensis Pau & Font Quer ”, as in Carrasco (1975). APD (2020) cites this name at the form rank . Auvray & Malecot (2013) also mention the BC and MPU specimens as isolectotypes. The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as C. arboreus subsp. baeticus by Talavera in 1995, but, as mentioned above, Auvray & Malecot (2013) and APD (2020) do not accept infraspecific taxa.

1,2,3 Sarothamnus megalanthus Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1927 nº 288 (1928), in sched.

≡ Cytisus striatus subsp. megalanthus (Pau & Font Quer) Rivas Mart. & Belmonte

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in quercetis juxta Bu-Meziat (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1700 m. alt.; 16 junii”

Lectotype (designated by Auvray & Malecot 2013: 106; second-step designated here):—In quercetis juxta Bu-Meziat (Atlante rhiphaeo), 1700 m, 16 June 1927, Font Quer 288-1927 (lectotype MPU 006310 [photo!] [https:// herbier.umontpellier.fr/hv/wakka.php?wiki=PagePrincipale/iframe&action=detail&ordre=p&codebarre= MPU 00 6310]; isolectotypes BC 13586 !*, BCN 17309 [photo!], GDA 34672 [photo!], FI 000727 [photo!], G 00022416 [photo!]*, JE 00014562 [photo!], MA 60386 !*, MPU 006311 [photo!])

Notes:— Auvray & Malecot (2013) designated the specimen of the Iter Maroccanum preserved at Herb. MPU as lectotype, due to the presence of both flowers and fruit and its availability online, without indicating the catalogue number. But currently, in MPU there is one sheet with flowers ( MPU 006311) and another with fruit ( MPU 006310), probably parts of the same specimen. Therefore, according to Art. 9.17 ( Turland et al. 2018) a second-step lectotype should be designated, since both have different barcode numbers. MPU 006310 is selected, because it is the only one that bears the original Iter Maroccanum label. Auvray & Malecot (2013) also cites as isolectotypes the BC, G, and MA specimens. The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC and G specimens were identified as Sarothamnus striatus (Hill) Samp. by Talavera in 1995.

1,2,3 Satureja amplifoliata Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 394 (1930a), in sched.

= Acinos alpinus subsp. meridionalis (Nyman) P.W.Ball

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in cedretis montis Djebel Daddoh (Ktama), ad 1900 m. alt.; 28 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In cedretis montis Djebel Daddoh (Ktama), 1900 m, 28 June 1929, Font Quer 394- 1929 (lectotype MA 105174 ! [http://colecciones.rjb.csic.es/#cardAdv.php?CatalogNumber=MA-01-00105174]; isolectotypes BC 97975 !, BCN 72526 [photo!], G 00424758 [photo!], GDA 32471 [photo!], MPU 006652 [photo!], S-G 5465 [photo!],)

Notes:—The selected lectotype is the MA specimen, since it has a complete plant with roots. The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as Satureja alpina subsp. meridionalis (Nyman) Greuter & Burdet by Montserrat & Sáez in 2001, and the MA specimen as Acinos alpinus ( L.) Moench by Morales in 2000s. It should be noted that Morales (2010) does not consider any infraspecific rank for this species.

1,3 Satureja baborensis var. occidentalis Pau in Sennen & Mauricio, Cat. Fl. Rif Orient.: 89 (1934), nom. nud.

= Calamintha grandiflora subsp. baborensis (Batt.) N.Galland

Note:—The name was cited in Sennen & Mauricio (1934) and Sennen (1936a), both with neither description nor diagnosis.

1,3 Saxifraga globulifera var. divaricata Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 218 (1930a), in sched.

= Saxifraga globulifera Desf.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupibus arenaceis umbrosis, c. sanctuarium Sidi Mohfi (Beni Seddat), ad 1750 m. alt.; 14 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In rupibus arenaceis umbrosis, c. sanctuarium Sidi Mohfi (Beni Seddat), 1750 m, 14 June 1929, Font Quer 218-1929 (lectotype BC 98628 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98628 . jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 72416 [photo!], GDA 38942 [photo!], MA 52985 !, MPU 006682 [photo!], MPU 006683 [photo!], RAB 005048 [photo!]*, RAB 034480 [photo!]*)

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. El Oualidi et al. (2012) cite as types both specimens at Herb. RAB. The BC specimen was identified as S. globulifera by Vargas in 1997.

1,3 Saxifraga granatensis var. minuscula Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 158 (1929), in sched.

= Saxifraga globulifera Desf.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupestribus montis Magot, 900 m. alt., supra Xauen; 8 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In rupestribus montis Magot, supra Xauen, 900 m, 8 May 1928, Font Quer 158- 1928 (lectotype BC 23731 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC23731 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 18019 [photo!], GDA 38952 [photo!], MA 52977 !, MPU 002335 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU voucher as holotype by Madaule, Durand, and Loup in 2004. The BC specimen was identified as S. globulifera by Vargas in 1997.

1,3 Saxifraga maweana var. oscilans Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 157 (1929), in sched.

= Saxifraga globulifera Desf.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupestibus calc. Yebel Kalaa, 1000 m. alt.; 13 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In rupestibus calc. Yebel Kalaa, 1000 m, 13 May 1928, Font Quer 157-1928 (lectotype BC 24134 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC24134 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 71163 [photo!], GDA 38977 [photo!], MA 52888 !, MPU 006418 [photo!], MPU 006419 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as S. globulifera by Vargas in 1998.

1,3 Saxifraga minutifolia Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1930 nº 277 (1932), in sched.

= Saxifraga tricrenata Pau & Font Quer

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupibus calc. supra fontem Ain-d’azem-zem dictum (Dj. Azahan-Beni Selman), ad 1800 m. alt.; 8 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):— In rupibus calc. supra fontem Ain-d’azem-zem dictum (Dj. Azahan-Beni Selman), 1800 m, 8 June 1930, Font Quer 277-1930 (lectotype BC 825904 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC825904 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 73031 [photo!], BM 000602891 [photo!], G 00424835 [photo!], GDA 38981 [photo!], MA 53003 !, MPU 006754 [photo!], S 08-15558 [photo!], Z 000028173 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. The BC specimen was identified as S. tricrenata by Vargas in 1998.

1,3 Saxifraga reuteriana var. rhiphaea Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1929 nº 219 (1930a), in sched.

= Saxifraga globulifera Desf.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupibus calc. montis Djebel Afgal (Beni Smih), ad 800 m. alt.; 10 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In rupibus calc. montis Djebel Afgal (Beni Smih), 800 m, 10 May 1929, Font Quer 219-1929 (lectotype BC 98629 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC98629 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 72415 [photo!], G 00424836 [photo!], GDA 39015 [photo!], MA 52880 !, MPU 006680 [photo!], MPU 006681 [photo!], RAB 034612 [photo!]*, RAB 005050 [photo!]*)

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. El Oualidi et al. (2012) cited as syntypes both specimens at Herb. RAB. The BC and MA specimens were identified as S. globulifera by Vargas in 1997 and Webb in 1965, respectively.

1,3 Saxifraga tricrenata Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 156 (1929), in sched.

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in fissuris rupium calc. Yebel Kalaa, 1400 m. alt.; 11 junii”

Lectotype (designated here):—In fissuris rupium calc. Yebel Kalaa, 1400 m, 11 June 1928, Font Quer 156- 1928 (lectotype BC 812956 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC812956 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 18020 [photo!], G 00439674 [photo!], GDA 39039 [photo!], MA 52898 !, MA 53002 !, MPU 003403 [photo!], MPU 003404 [photo!], Z 000028176 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013, and the MPU specimens as isosyntypes by Durand, Loup, Madaule, and Spitzer in 2005. Determination of the BC specimen was confirmed by Vargas in 1997.

1,2,3 Saxifraga werneri Font Quer & Pau in Font Quer, Cavanillesia 4: 29 (1931a)

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in saxosis calcareis cacuminis montis Dj. Lexhab (Gomara-Imp. Maroccano), ad 2100−2150 m. alt., ubi florieram, d. 26 Junii 1930”

Lectotype (designated here):— In rupestribus cacuminis mont. Dj. Lexhab (Gomara), 2150 m, 25 June 1930, Font Quer 278-1930 (lectotype BC 812961 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC812961 .jpg]; isolectotypes BCN 20120 [photo!], GDA 39061 [photo!], MA 53004 !, MPU 007140 [photo!])

Notes:— The original material was labelled as cotype (= syntype) and collected on 25 June 1930, although in the protologue it is indicated as 26 June 1930. In Herb. MPU there are also two specimens collected by Maire from “montis Kraa” ( MPU 007141 [photo!], MPU 007142 [photo!]), a locality that corresponds indeed to Djbel Lakraa (the highest peak in Talassemtane National Park ) as the name “ Dj. Lexhab ”. Because the elevation at which these specimens were gathered is not the same (2100 m), they are not included as isolectotypes; but they are original material, as the gathering matches the data in the protologue. Determination of the BC specimen was confirmed by Vargas in 1997 .

1,3 Scabiosa ateridoi Pau in Bol. Soc. Aragonesa Ci. Nat. 17: 130 (1918)

= Sixalix atropurpurea subsp. maritima (L.) Greuter & Burdet

Ind. loc.:—“Tifasor; y fueron recogidas desde el día 10 al 30 de Julio del año 1915”

Lectotype (designated by Devesa 1984: 175):— Tifasor ( Melilla), July 1915, Aterido s.n. ( BC 28420 ! [https:// www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC28420 .jpg])

Notes:—The specimen was identified as Scabiosa atropurpurea L. by Romo in 1995, but according to Tahiri & Ibn Tattou (2014) all the plants from Morocco have to be attributed to Sixalix atropurpurea subsp. maritima . APD (2020) cites this taxon as Scabiosa maritima var. ateridoi Pau , but this name should be considered a combination published by Sennen & Mauricio (1934: 55) according to Art. 41.3 ( Turland et al. 2018).

1,2,3 Scabiosa tomentosa var. maroccana Pau & Font Quer in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1928 nº 387 (1929), in sched.

= Scabiosa turolensis subsp. grosii (Pau) Greuter & Burdet

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in glareosis calc. montis Kalaa, 1000 m. alt.; 29 junii”

Lectotype (designated by Devesa 1984: 171):—In glareosis calc. montis Kalaa, 1000 m, 29 June 1928, Font Quer 387-1928 (lectotype MA 120393 !* [http://colecciones.rjb.csic.es/#cardAdv.php?CatalogNumber=MA-01- 00120393]; isolectotypes BC 28500 !, BCN 71377 [photo!], MPU 006603 [photo!])

Note:—The MA specimen was identified as Scabiosa turolensis var. grosii Pau by Devesa in 1981, and the BC specimen as S. turolensis subsp. maroccana (Pau & Font Quer) Romo by Romo in 1995.

1,2,3 Scabiosa weyleri Pau in Font Quer, Iter Marocc. 1930 nº 634 (1932), in sched.

≡ Scabiosa turolensis subsp. weyleri (Pau) Romo

Ind. loc.:—“Hab. in rupibus calc. montis Dj. Dersa, supra Tetauen, ad 500 m. alt.; 20 majii”

Lectotype (designated here):— In rupibus calc. montis Dj. Dersa, supra Tetauen, 500 m, 20 May 1930, Font Quer 634-1930 (lectotype BC 137305 ! [https://www.ibb.csic.es/herbari/ JPEG / BC137305 .jpg]; isolectotypes B 10 0154970 [photo!]*, BCN 73485 [photo!], GDA 28843 [photo!], MA 120351 !, MPU 005251 [photo!]*, S 12- 8281 [photo!], Z 000006899 [photo!])

Notes:—The GDA specimen was labelled as syntype by Vizoso in 2013. El Oualidi et al. (2012) cited the B specimen as type, and Dobignard (2009) regarded the MPU specimen as isotype. Determination of the BC specimen was confirmed by Romo in 1997.