Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856

Alekseev, Vitalii I. & Tomaszewska, Wioletta, 2018, New handsome fungus beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinelloidea: Anamorphidae, Endomychidae) from European amber of the Upper Eocene, Palaeontologia Electronica (6 A) 21 (1), pp. 1-23 : 17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/832

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:152941A8-052F-4134-9E98-ABC4CAC8F01B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11061811

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03986E15-FFCB-4B14-0E4E-4A93FC24FA9C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856
status

 

Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856

Figure 6.6 View FIGURE 6 -7

Material examined. One complete specimen with the collection number 1219-3 [ CCHH], Baltic amber, Yantarny , Kaliningrad Region, Russia. Body length of the beetle 3.04 mm. The amber piece is embedded in a block of polyester resin (total measurements are 12 x 10 x 6 mm). Syninclusions absent. The amber piece was subjected to thermal and high-pressure processing in an autoclave. Left and ventral parts of specimen are obscured by a dense milky cover in the surrounding amber .

Note. The important characters are unfortunately not visible or insufficiently visible on the specimen. The re-description and exact subfamilial placement of Phymaphoroides are still impossible based on this specimen. The discernible enlarged antennomere 9 with deep concavity on its inner edge looks like that of the subfamily Danascelinae Tomaszewska, 2000 . In the future, detailed comparison of a better visible Phymaphoroides specimen with the newly described Laima gen. nov. is recommended, due to observed similarities between both studied specimens.

However, without a study of the type specimen of Phymaphoroides antennatus , the proper subfamilal placement of this genus cannot be resolved. And unfortunately the location of the type material described by Motschulsky from Baltic amber in the Menge collection [West-Preussisches Provinzial-Museum Danzig], among which is the holotype of Ph. antennatus , is unknown, precluding a reinvestigation of this fossil. The original description lacks many characters important for comparison ( Shockley and Alekseev, 2014) making subsequent conclusions about Phymaphoroides speculative.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF