Rana umbraculata Bush, 1952

Channing, Alan, 2015, The Maluti Mystery revisited: Taxonomy of African River Frogs (Pyxicephalidae, Amietia) on the Drakensberg Mountains in southern Africa, Zootaxa 3925 (2), pp. 271-280 : 278

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.2.8

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EDA5F834-F90A-46E7-A987-448A02F77AC9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6102087

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3F11878F-DC3F-FFAA-7AC3-CB6BB670B80C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rana umbraculata Bush, 1952
status

 

Identification of Rana umbraculata Bush, 1952

Bush (1952) distinguished R. umbraculata from R. vertebralis on the basis of its large size compared to the immature type of Rana vertebralis , and small differences in the pectoral girdle. These were later shown by Poynton (1964) to not be valid. The description, excellent photographs, and examination of the topotype NMSA 2608 shows that while most statements are not diagnostic, five refer to the Maluti River Frog—Interorbital space 1 to 1.25 the distance between nostrils; eye-tympanum slightly less than eye; fingers with small rounded discs or tubercles; web reaches terminal tubercle of toes; tympanum smaller than eye-tympanum distance. A single statement does not refer to all Maluti River Frogs—Heels meet but do not overlap when the limbs are folded at right angles to the body axis. The short legs of the type are illustrated in Tarrant et al. (2008 Fig 2 View FIGURE 2 B). Note that the Tarrant et al. Figure 2 View FIGURE 2 B is flipped horizontally. Examination of the paratypes NMSA 712, and NMSA 2608, a large 120 mm SUL topotype collected from the Umzimkulu River by Bob Crass in 1951 show that the heels overlap considerably, demonstrating that leg length is variable in the population.

Identification of Rana draconensis FitzSimons, 1948 and Phrynobatrachus lawrencei FitzSimons, 1947 Poynton (1964) assigned both these names as junior synonyms of Rana hymenopus Boulenger, 1920 . This action is not in contention. I examined the types of Rana draconensis NMSA 734 and Phrynobatrachus lawrencei NMSA 669 confirming that these are typical Phofung River Frogs ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ).

DNA sequences. On the basis of a molecular study, Tarrant et al. (2008) placed the Phofung River Frog in the genus Amietia as it formed a clade with Amietia dracomontana (Channing, 1978) now a junior synonym of Amietia quecketti (Boulenger, 1894) , plus two forms identified as Amietia angolensis (Bocage, 1866) and the Maluti River Frog. The genus Strongylopus formed a separate clade, represented by S. bonaespei (Dubois, 1980) , S. fasciatus (Smith, 1849) and S. wageri (Wager, 1961) . A new phylogeny of all the species of Amietia , using four genes, confirms that the Phofung River Frog is firmly embedded within this genus (A. Channing unpubl. data).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Anura

Family

Ranidae

Genus

Rana

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF